Start a check
SignAllow

How we verify

What has to be true before a number appears on this site

What our checks establish

SignAllow calculates selected published sign rules from your inputs. A result is a preliminary interpretation of the sources on file, not municipal approval or a complete determination for the property. No planner, lawyer or municipality has approved these results.

Evidence states

  • Verified within scope: the identified proposition is supported by the applicable primary source reviewed. This does not verify all other rules or later amendments.
  • Conditional: the result depends on the selected sign classification, district, measurements and stated conditions.
  • Unresolved: missing information, conflicting sources or uncertain applicability prevents a conclusion.
  • Unavailable or unchecked: the necessary source could not be read, or that issue has not been reviewed.

Sources, dates and amendments

Stored excerpts identify their source and provision. Source access dates, document publication dates, effective dates and substantive review dates are different. A working link, matching quotation or unchanged document fingerprint does not establish that a consolidation includes all later amendments, schedules or property-specific exceptions. Confirm those with the municipality before relying on a result.

Automated checks and interpretation

Automated checks compare figures with stored quotations, compare source text using extraction tools and exercise software scenarios. They do not provide independent legal interpretation. Historical research records describe earlier AI readings; this audit cannot establish their independence from those records alone. A source-check failure is a report for investigation, not proof that an already published result has automatically been removed. Release enforcement has not been verified.

Scope of calculated limits

Coverage varies by municipality, district and sign type. A calculated area limit does not establish permitted dimensions, quantity, placement, illumination or installation. Required measurements must be supplied using the local definitions. Existing signage, approved plans, variances and transitional provisions may change the answer. A permit exemption is separate from permission to install. A face change is not assumed exempt or permit-required without the applicable provision and scope of work.

Conflicts and fees

Conflicting provisions remain unresolved; choosing the smaller number does not establish compliance. Fees depend on the current schedule, chargeable sign faces and any additional approvals. Toronto’s 2026 application pages identify a newer sign-fee minimum, but the published charging unit and combined total still conflict with other official sources. Its total stays withheld; the displayed minimum is a published component, not a confirmed project price. Age-based warnings are reminders, not evidence that a source remains current.

Property screening

Map results concern the selected point and identified layer, not a surveyed parcel. Failed or empty lookups do not clear restrictions. A qualified negative result concerns only that dated layer and its verified geography. Heritage districts, individual heritage properties, conservation authorities, highway control, road ownership and rail operators require separate checks. Metrolinx information does not clear other rail operators.

Resolving an open result

Use the official source and Who to ask & what to send beside the finding. Include the address, sign type, measurements, existing approvals, proposed changes and cited provision. Ask which current rule applies and what evidence would settle it. Obtain a referral if jurisdiction is uncertain. Copying a draft does not send it or resolve the finding.

← Back to the checker